Samsung 860 EVO Specifications

Samsung 860 EVO Specs
Type element: 2.five-inch
Interface: SATA: 6 Gbps
NAND: Samsung 3D V-NAND 3bit MLC
Capacities: 4TB, 2TB, 1TB, 500GB, 250GB
Cache: 4GB LPDDR4 (4TB)
2GB LPDDR4 (2TB)
1GB LPDDR4 (1TB)
512MB LPDDR4 (250/500GB)
Controller: Samsung MJX Controller
Efficiency
Seq.Study/Write Velocity: Around 550/520MB/s
Ran.Study/Generate Pace (QD32): Max. 98K IOPS / 90K IOPS
Gadget Slumber: 2.six mW for 1TB (Approximately 8mW for 4TB)
Administration SW: Magician Application for SSD management
TBW (Endurance): 4TB: 2,four hundred TBW
2TB: 1,two hundred TBW
1TB: 600 TBW
500GB: 300 TBW
250GB: a hundred and fifty TBW
Warranty: five many years or nearly 2,four hundred TBW
Design and style and Build

The new 860 EVO line is just like earlier EVO strains, which is, a black circumstance and a light grey sq. displayed on The underside Center beneath the Samsung brand. A sticker is placed on the back again of your drive, which suggests information you would possibly require which include product amount, serial range, and capacity.
Samsung 860 EVO Specifications


When opening up the generate, you will notice The brand new Samsung’s new MJX controller, NAND pack, and DRAM on the modest PCB.



Flipping the PCB around shows another NAND pack.



Effectiveness
Testbed

The test platform leveraged in these exams is often a Dell PowerEdge R740xd server. We evaluate performance through a Dell H730P RAID card inside this server, Despite the fact that we established the cardboard in HBA manner only to disable the effects of RAID card cache. The methodology used far better displays conclude-consumer workflow Along with the regularity, scalability and adaptability tests in just virtualized server offers. A large concentrate is put on drive latency across the entire load selection of the drive, not just at the smallest QD1 (Queue-Depth one) concentrations. We make this happen for the reason that a lot of the prevalent shopper benchmarks don’t sufficiently capture finish-person workload profiles.

SQL Server General performance

We use a light-weight virtualized SQL Server instance to appropriately represent what an software developer would use on a neighborhood workstation. The examination is similar to what we operate on storage arrays and company drives, just scaled back to become a better approximation for behaviors used by the tip user. The workload employs The existing draft on the Transaction Processing Efficiency Council’s Benchmark C (TPC-C), an internet transaction processing benchmark that simulates the activities located in sophisticated software environments.

The lightweight SQL Server VM is configured with three vDisks: 100GB quantity for boot, a 350GB volume for that database and log data files, plus a 150GB quantity employed for the database backup we Get well following each run. From the program useful resource viewpoint, we configure each VM with 16 vCPUs, 32GB of DRAM and leverage the LSI Logic SAS SCSI controller. This test employs SQL Server 2014 operating on Home windows Server 2012 R2 visitor VMs, and is also stressed by Dell’s Benchmark Manufacturing facility for Databases.

SQL Server Testing Configuration (for each VM)

Home windows Server 2012 R2
Storage Footprint: 600GB allotted, 500GB employed
SQL Server 2014
Databases Dimension: 1,five hundred scale
Virtual Consumer Load: fifteen,000
RAM Buffer: 24GB
Test Size: three several hours
2.5 hrs preconditioning
thirty minutes sample time period
When thinking about SQL Server Output, the 1TB Samsung 860 EVO drive recorded 3,147 TPS, which was just guiding the 850 Professional 1TB.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *